<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appeals Court Denies Reconsideration; GCO Intends to Seek Supreme Court Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/</link>
	<description>Fighting for firearms rights in Georgia.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: shamalama</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/#comment-5714</link>
		<dc:creator>shamalama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/#comment-5714</guid>
		<description>From the Court of Appeals Opinion, "Moore argues that [i]f the probate judge does not
hear from local law enforcement within 50 days, [he or] she can (and must) assume that no derogatory information has been found[,] and issue the license.  We disagree."

I understand the Court having the fear that, due to the inherent inefficiencies of government bureaucracy, someone otherwise not allowed to have a license could end up getting one just because the reporting agency didn't have enough time to properly process the applicant's information.   None of us want a drug dealer or felon to have a legal carry license.

BUT this ruling could become a very slippery slope, with government bodies purposely dragging their feet and returning to a de facto "can issue" situation.

For what it's worth, today is Day 42 in my wait to get a concealed weapons license through Rockdale County, a license they "threatened" could take 16 weeks.

Thank you GCO for your continued efforts to help us "little guys" keep our rights as law-abiding citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Court of Appeals Opinion, &#8220;Moore argues that [i]f the probate judge does not<br />
hear from local law enforcement within 50 days, [he or] she can (and must) assume that no derogatory information has been found[,] and issue the license.  We disagree.&#8221;</p>
<p>I understand the Court having the fear that, due to the inherent inefficiencies of government bureaucracy, someone otherwise not allowed to have a license could end up getting one just because the reporting agency didn&#8217;t have enough time to properly process the applicant&#8217;s information.   None of us want a drug dealer or felon to have a legal carry license.</p>
<p>BUT this ruling could become a very slippery slope, with government bodies purposely dragging their feet and returning to a de facto &#8220;can issue&#8221; situation.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, today is Day 42 in my wait to get a concealed weapons license through Rockdale County, a license they &#8220;threatened&#8221; could take 16 weeks.</p>
<p>Thank you GCO for your continued efforts to help us &#8220;little guys&#8221; keep our rights as law-abiding citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
