Comments on: GCO is a pro-gun group with a dangerous agenda . . . http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/ Fighting for firearms rights in Georgia. Fri, 16 May 2008 05:28:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Firearms License Holders are Not Criminals http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6032 Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:15:06 +0000 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6032 [...] Thanks, Randy!  You can see Maureen Downey’s editorial here. Share this news with your fellow citizens: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...] […] Thanks, Randy!  You can see Maureen Downey’s editorial here. Share this news with your fellow citizens: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. […]

]]> by: Georgia Carry : An information clearinghouse for Georgia Firearms License issues and news » Blog Archive » Firearms License Holders are Not Criminals http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6031 Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:15:23 +0000 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6031 [...] Thanks, Randy!  You can see Maureen Downey’s editorial here. [...] […] Thanks, Randy!  You can see Maureen Downey’s editorial here. […]

]]> by: Thorsen http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6016 Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:56:16 +0000 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6016 It is a shame that Ms. Downey and others like her are so focused on attempting to remove the law-abiding citizens' right to self-defense. We all know that criminals will not obey any so-called "gun free zone" and that establishing such zones simply causes the law-abiding citizen to be disarmed. Essentially they are disarmament zones that create a target rich environment for the criminal. Case in point, most of our nation's most violent crimes occured in these disarmament zones: Virginia Tech, Columbine, Lubby Texas and other massacres are all examples of this point. When will people realize that disarming the most law-abiding segment of society does nothing but create additional areas for criminals to safely ply their trade in violence? It is a shame that Ms. Downey and others like her are so focused on attempting to remove the law-abiding citizens’ right to self-defense. We all know that criminals will not obey any so-called “gun free zone” and that establishing such zones simply causes the law-abiding citizen to be disarmed. Essentially they are disarmament zones that create a target rich environment for the criminal. Case in point, most of our nation’s most violent crimes occured in these disarmament zones: Virginia Tech, Columbine, Lubby Texas and other massacres are all examples of this point.

When will people realize that disarming the most law-abiding segment of society does nothing but create additional areas for criminals to safely ply their trade in violence?

]]> by: jcorry http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6007 Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:58:24 +0000 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/23/gco-is-a-pro-gun-group-with-a-dangerous-agenda/#comment-6007 I'm a law abiding, background checked, productive member of society. Whether or not I have a gun on me when I go to the park (or anywhere else) is nobody's business but mine and will never be an issue and never even be revealed to anyone at all unless I (or my familiy) become the victim of a criminal assault. When will they get that it's not me that needs to be regulated and controlled by disarmament laws...and that the people who are a threat don't respond to disarmament laws? I’m a law abiding, background checked, productive member of society.

Whether or not I have a gun on me when I go to the park (or anywhere else) is nobody’s business but mine and will never be an issue and never even be revealed to anyone at all unless I (or my familiy) become the victim of a criminal assault.

When will they get that it’s not me that needs to be regulated and controlled by disarmament laws…and that the people who are a threat don’t respond to disarmament laws?

]]>