Comments on: Roswell Denies Banning Guns in Parks http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/21/roswell-denies-banning-guns-in-parks/ Fighting for firearms rights in Georgia. Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:38:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: murry http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/21/roswell-denies-banning-guns-in-parks/#comment-6714 murry Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:40:10 +0000 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/21/roswell-denies-banning-guns-in-parks/#comment-6714 It is nothing more than legal double speak used by lawyers. The City of Roswell doesn't want to admit and will not deny the law exist. Of course any person with an ounce of commen sense can read it on LexisNexis or the look it up. The whole "speaks for themselves" comment is acknowlegment of the GCO letter, but not of the context of it. Again, legal double talk. It is nothing more than legal double speak used by lawyers. The City of Roswell doesn’t want to admit and will not deny the law exist. Of course any person with an ounce of commen sense can read it on LexisNexis or the look it up. The whole “speaks for themselves” comment is acknowlegment of the GCO letter, but not of the context of it. Again, legal double talk.

]]> By: Gunstar1 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/21/roswell-denies-banning-guns-in-parks/#comment-6671 Gunstar1 Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:19:02 +0000 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/21/roswell-denies-banning-guns-in-parks/#comment-6671 Hey murry how about this? GCO's complaint says in various part that we sent a letter (or email) to them saying XXX and quoted exactly what was sent. I cant understand how the reply can say the documents "speak for themselves", yet the city is still "without knowledge or information" about information contained in that very document. Are they admitting they don't read their mail? They acknowledge they received the letter, is the reason it speaks for itself because no one bothered to read it? Hey murry how about this? GCO’s complaint says in various part that we sent a letter (or email) to them saying XXX and quoted exactly what was sent.
I cant understand how the reply can say the documents “speak for themselves”, yet the city is still “without knowledge or information” about information contained in that very document.

Are they admitting they don’t read their mail? They acknowledge they received the letter, is the reason it speaks for itself because no one bothered to read it?

]]> By: murry http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/21/roswell-denies-banning-guns-in-parks/#comment-6669 murry Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:38:52 +0000 http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/21/roswell-denies-banning-guns-in-parks/#comment-6669 Guess Roswell just had a little typo in their city ordiance and forgot correct it. Right. Guess Roswell just had a little typo in their city ordiance and forgot correct it. Right.

]]>