<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Refuses to Review 60-Day Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/</link>
	<description>Fighting for firearms rights in Georgia.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MrMorden</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/#comment-6707</link>
		<dc:creator>MrMorden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/#comment-6707</guid>
		<description>So what does this mean, exactly?  That the probate courts can indefinitely delay issuing a GFL if they say the delay is caused by "background checks?"  If that's the case, what's stopping a court from bogging down processing the background checks and effectively ceasing GFL issues in that county?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what does this mean, exactly?  That the probate courts can indefinitely delay issuing a GFL if they say the delay is caused by &#8220;background checks?&#8221;  If that&#8217;s the case, what&#8217;s stopping a court from bogging down processing the background checks and effectively ceasing GFL issues in that county?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
