Comments on: Cherokee County Files Answer, Moves to Dismiss Case; GCO Responds

By: Digitalyons

Digitalyons — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:17:28 +0000

As a resident of Cherokee county and also a carrier of a permit with this Judges signature on it I will certainly keep my eye on this matter.

By: Ed Stone

Ed Stone — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:07:31 +0000

Murry, No ruling yet! The federal judge may very well rule for GCO. All that has happened is that a motion to dismiss has been filed for lack of standing, and GCO has responded to the motion. When there is a ruling on the motion, you will see it here.

By: Vir Quisque Vir

Vir Quisque Vir — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:52:23 +0000

Who died and made these errant probate judges king (or queen)? We are asking them no more than to follow the laws they were sworn to uphold. The fact is a few of the probate judges are dragging their feet, denying 2nd amendment rights. I guess obstinate probate judges need a little nudging to facilitate them doing the right thing. Thanks for the nudge.

By: murry

murry — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:26:30 +0000

It is plainly obvious the judge is an activist and against firearms. Otherwise he would have ruled in favore of GeorgiaCarry. This would have been the conclusion of any person who saw the evidence and has a brain.

By: rbstern

rbstern — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:49:34 +0000

The hubris of the the probate judge is astonishing.

Thanks, Mr. Monroe! It’s obvious you bring a world of experience to these matters, clearly critical to GCO’s ability to win these cases. Thank you!

By: Gunstar1

Gunstar1 — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:47:09 +0000

Now this is a perfect example of some twisted thinking by a Probate Judge.

“Plaintiffs� Complaint alleges that Defendant�s clerk refused to accept the GFL application without the social security number and employment information supplied. The Complaint is silent as to whether Plaintiff Breed attempted to submit the application without providing such information.”

Huh?

So they really would have processed it without the SSN and employment info if the applicant would have just realized that the clerk was lying, so it is the applicant’s fault.