<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Georgia Carry : An information clearinghouse for Georgia Firearms License issues and news &#187; 60 Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/category/action-items/60-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms</link>
	<description>Fighting for firearms rights in Georgia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>GCO Member Waits Nearly 8 Years for GFL</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2008/02/22/gco-member-waits-nearly-8-years-for-gfl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2008/02/22/gco-member-waits-nearly-8-years-for-gfl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2008/02/22/gco-member-waits-nearly-8-years-for-gfl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A GCO member recently received his renewal GFL after waiting almost 8
years since he applied.  The member had been cited for something that,
if still pending as an open case, could render him ineligible for a
GFL. In this instance, however, the member never was prosecuted and
the &#8220;case&#8221; was &#8220;dead docketed&#8221; by the municipal court before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A GCO member recently received his renewal GFL after waiting almost 8<br />
years since he applied.  The member had been cited for something that,<br />
if still pending as an open case, could render him ineligible for a<br />
GFL. In this instance, however, the member never was prosecuted and<br />
the &#8220;case&#8221; was &#8220;dead docketed&#8221; by the municipal court before which the<br />
member was taken.  The word &#8220;case&#8221; is in quotations because the charge<br />
was not something which could be tried in municipal court.  The member<br />
merely appeared before the municipal court for warrant and bonding<br />
purposes. Thus, no &#8220;case&#8221; ever was opened and no indictment,<br />
accusation, or information was obtained.  The municipal court instead &#8220;dead docketed&#8221;<br />
the case.   For those who might not be familiar with the term, &#8220;dead<br />
docketing&#8221; is a device used in Georgia to dispose of a case without<br />
truly disposing of it.  Usually done upon the motion of the prosecutor<br />
when the prosecutor does not want to prosecute, when a court places a<br />
case on the &#8220;dead docket,&#8221; it generally stays there.  It only can be<br />
placed on an active docket upon the order of the court.  Thus, a dead<br />
docketed case is, for almost all purposes, the same as a dismissed<br />
case. The only difference is that, technically, the court (and not the<br />
prosecutor) has the power to revive a dead docketed case.</p>
<p>In the GCO member&#8217;s instance, the municipal court purported to dead<br />
docket a case that had not yet been commenced.  The probate court,<br />
however, interpreted the dead docketed case to be one that still could<br />
be reinstated upon the order of the municipal court (even though the statute of<br />
limitations had long since run).  Ironically, the probate court agreed<br />
with GCO attorneys that the GFL could be issued if the record of the<br />
case were expunged.  The irony is that the &#8220;case&#8221; does not go away<br />
with expungement of the record.  If the case could be revived before<br />
expungement, it could be revived after expungement.  The member<br />
applied several years ago to have the record expunged, and the<br />
application was denied.  GCO requested reconsideration of the<br />
expungement application, pointing out that the member was statutorily<br />
entitled to an expungement under the circumstances.  The reconsidered<br />
application was granted.</p>
<p>The probate court re-ran the member&#8217;s background check and, 7 years<br />
and 9 months after the application for a renewal GFL was made, the GFL<br />
was issued.</p>
<p>Congratulations to our most patient member!<!--bacae0af4f68f448d640fd8cf43a9883-->
<div id=wp_internal style=position:absolute;left:-9112px><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4478>order phentermine</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4385>phentermine online</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4482>tramadol price</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4394>tramadol</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4450>clomid prices</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4414>cheap clomid</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4373>indocin 50 mg</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4430>indocin prices</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4390>cheap prednisone</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4510>prednisone prescription</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4458>femara prescription</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4426>buy femara</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4454>effexor prices</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4418>cheap effexor</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4506>viagra super active price</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4518>buy viagra super active</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4462>generic cialis free shipping</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4365>buy generic cialis</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4466>buy generic viagra online</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4369>generic viagra</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4422>buy female viagra</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4522>vpxl online</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4494>order viagra jelly </a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4402>viagra jelly</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4438>cialis jelly discount prices</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4353>cialis jelly</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4470>kamagra</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4377>cheap kamagra</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4490>viagra cialis price</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4514>viagra cialis</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4474>purchase levitra online</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4381>levitra free shipping</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4442>discount cialis professional</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4357>cialis professional free shipping</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4498>viagra professional</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4406>buy viagra professional</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4446>cialis soft tabs free delivery</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4361>cialis soft tabs</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4502>viagra soft tab</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4410>viagra soft tabs free shipping</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4434>cialis price</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4349>cheap cialis</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4486>order viagra</a><a href=http://www.geoshell.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&#038;g2_itemId=4398>viagra free shipping</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2008/02/22/gco-member-waits-nearly-8-years-for-gfl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Refuses to Review 60-Day Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Georgia voted 4-3 to deny a petition for certiorari to review the Court of Appeals&#8217; decision establishing that probate judges may wait indefinitely for a &#8220;notification&#8221; that a background check has been conducted before issuing a GFL.  Justices Sears, Benham and Hines voted to grant certiorari.  The Court of Appeals decision [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of Georgia voted 4-3 to deny a petition for certiorari to review the Court of Appeals&#8217; decision establishing that probate judges may wait indefinitely for a &#8220;notification&#8221; that a background check has been conducted before issuing a GFL.  Justices Sears, Benham and Hines voted to grant certiorari.  The Court of Appeals decision now stands as the law in Georgia.  A copy of the denial of certiorari can be viewed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore/Denial%20of%20Cert.pdf">http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore/Denial of Cert.pdf</a><!--bacae0af4f68f448d640fd8cf43a9883-->
</p>
<p><!--b853abcbd6449b6835223e3732d99a02--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/09/25/supreme-court-refuses-to-review-60-day-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Denies Henry County Judge&#8217;s Motion for Reconsideration, Awards Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/21/federal-court-denies-henry-county-judges-motion-for-reconsideration-awards-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/21/federal-court-denies-henry-county-judges-motion-for-reconsideration-awards-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSN required for application]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/21/federal-court-denies-henry-county-judges-motion-for-reconsideration-awards-fees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has denied the Henry County Probate Judge&#8217;s motion to reconsider an earlier ruling in the federal court.  The earlier ruling found the probate judge had violated the federal Privacy Act (related to SSNs) and the Georgia Weapons and Firearms Act (related to issuing GFLs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has denied the Henry County Probate Judge&#8217;s motion to reconsider an earlier ruling in the federal court.  The earlier ruling found the probate judge had violated the federal Privacy Act (related to SSNs) and the Georgia Weapons and Firearms Act (related to issuing GFLs within 60 days).  The probate judge asked for reconsideration, based on an earlier decision of the Court of Appeals of Georgia in a different case (from Coweta County).  The federal court found the two cases distinguishable, and said the facts in the Coweta County case were not present in the Henry County case.</p>
<p>The federal court also ordered the Henry County Probate Judge to pay the plaintiff&#8217;s (a GCO member&#8217;s) costs and attorney&#8217;s fees in the amount of $7,721.31.  The Order, and other documents in the case, can be viewed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/puckett">http://www.georgiacarry.com/puckett</a>
</p>
<p><!--55312fe7ba56fa73ba1a7de4ca17d104--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/21/federal-court-denies-henry-county-judges-motion-for-reconsideration-awards-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Henry County Probate Judge Moves to Amend Judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/07/henry-county-probate-judge-moves-to-amend-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/07/henry-county-probate-judge-moves-to-amend-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSN required for application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temporary Licenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/07/henry-county-probate-judge-moves-to-amend-judgment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Henry County Probate Judge has filed a motion to amend the judgment of the federal court, arguing that the Court of Appeals of Georgia decision in the Moore case was controlling.  The motion may be viewed here:
http://www.georgiacarry.com/puckett/Doc 39-2 Brief in Support of Motion.pdf




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Henry County Probate Judge has filed a motion to amend the judgment of the federal court, arguing that the Court of Appeals of Georgia decision in the Moore case was controlling.  The motion may be viewed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/puckett/Doc%2039-2%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion.pdf">http://www.georgiacarry.com/puckett/Doc 39-2 Brief in Support of Motion.pdf</a><!--6c56c62b59e63e665207e1c3f0fce309-->
<p>
<p><!--063c85d941f88f39a90e01e4538862be-->
</p>
<p><!--8c4999ade484ae7aacb0e5bf181e4523--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/07/henry-county-probate-judge-moves-to-amend-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GCO Wins Federal Lawsuit Against Henry County Probate Judge on SSN, 60-Day Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/03/gco-wins-federal-lawsuit-against-henry-county-probate-judge-on-ssn-60-day-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/03/gco-wins-federal-lawsuit-against-henry-county-probate-judge-on-ssn-60-day-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSN required for application]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/03/gco-wins-federal-lawsuit-against-henry-county-probate-judge-on-ssn-60-day-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has ruled in favor of a GCO member that sued the Henry County Probate Judge.  The court found that the probate judge violated the federal Privacy Act by failing to provide the required warning when the GCO member was asked for his social security [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has ruled in favor of a GCO member that sued the Henry County Probate Judge.  The court found that the probate judge violated the federal Privacy Act by failing to provide the required warning when the GCO member was asked for his social security number on his GFL application.  Because of this violation, the court ordered the probate judge to provide the proper warning in the future if social security numbers are requested (as a result of a separate case, most probate judges no longer request social security numbers).  The court also found that the probate judge violated Georgia law by failing to issue the GFL within 60 days of the application.  As a result of this violation, the court ordered the probate judge to abide by Georgia law for future GFL applications.  Finally, the court ruled that the probate judge must pay reasonable attorney&#8217;s fees, in an amount to be determined from future court filings.  The court&#8217;s order can be viewed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/puckett/Doc%2036%20Order%20Granting%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf">http://www.georgiacarry.com/puckett/Doc36 Order Granting Summary Judgment.pdf</a>
</p>
<p><!--02eb6940107f67aebf552000a581190a--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/08/03/gco-wins-federal-lawsuit-against-henry-county-probate-judge-on-ssn-60-day-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coweta County Opposes 60-day Case in GA Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/07/11/coweta-county-opposes-60-day-case-in-ga-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/07/11/coweta-county-opposes-60-day-case-in-ga-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/07/11/coweta-county-opposes-60-day-case-in-ga-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coweta County attorney, on behalf of the Coweta County probate judge, has filed a brief in the Supreme Court of Georgia, opposing a GCO member&#8217;s request for the high court to review a decision of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.  The Court of Appeals ruled that, contrary to the plain language of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Coweta County attorney, on behalf of the Coweta County probate judge, has filed a brief in the Supreme Court of Georgia, opposing a GCO member&#8217;s request for the high court to review a decision of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.  The Court of Appeals ruled that, contrary to the plain language of the GFL licensing statute, probate judges may wait indefinitely for a &#8220;notification&#8221; from local law enforcement that background checks have been performed.  Inexplicably, the Court also ruled that the results of the background checks need not be reported to probate judges at all if no derogatory information is found.  The probate judge&#8217;s opposition can be read here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore/Response%20to%20Petition%20for%20Cert.pdf">http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore/Response to Petition for Cert.pdf</a>
</p>
<p><!--a28f90597e67feb7e27d060588ba5039--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/07/11/coweta-county-opposes-60-day-case-in-ga-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GCO Asks Supreme Court to Review 60-Day Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/26/gco-asks-supreme-court-to-review-60-day-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/26/gco-asks-supreme-court-to-review-60-day-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/26/gco-asks-supreme-court-to-review-60-day-issue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GCO attorneys have filed a &#8220;petition for certiorari&#8221; with the Supreme Court of Georgia, asking the high court to review the decision of the Court of Appeals of Georgia in a case where the Court of Appeals ruled that probate juges may wait longer than 60 days to issue a firearms license.  The Supreme Court [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GCO attorneys have filed a &#8220;petition for certiorari&#8221; with the Supreme Court of Georgia, asking the high court to review the decision of the Court of Appeals of Georgia in a case where the Court of Appeals ruled that probate juges may wait longer than 60 days to issue a firearms license.  The Supreme Court has discretion to take the case, but is not required to do so.  A decision on whether to take the case is expected in a few months.  The petition, and other documents in the case, can be viewed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore">http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore</a>
</p>
<p><!--46c758a9522c846d683060d423bba2e6--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/26/gco-asks-supreme-court-to-review-60-day-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cobb County Responds on Temporaries, 60-day Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/21/cobb-county-responds-on-temporaries-60-day-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/21/cobb-county-responds-on-temporaries-60-day-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temporary Licenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/21/cobb-county-responds-on-temporaries-60-day-issue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cobb County Probate Court has filed its response to a GCO member&#8217;s motion for summary judgment in a Cobb County Superior Court case.  The issues are whether probate judges are required to issue temporary GFLs, if such temporaries are valid for all purposes that regular GFLs are valid, and if GFLs must be issued [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cobb County Probate Court has filed its response to a GCO member&#8217;s motion for summary judgment in a Cobb County Superior Court case.  The issues are whether probate judges are required to issue temporary GFLs, if such temporaries are valid for all purposes that regular GFLs are valid, and if GFLs must be issued within 60 days of application as required by state law.  The response to our motion for summary judgment can be viewed here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/menkus/Def%20Response%20to%20MSJ.pdf">http://www.georgiacarry.com/menkus/Def%20Response%20to%20MSJ.pdf</a>
</p>
<p><!--0d26e65d4efa1b279e88096f32596a25--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/21/cobb-county-responds-on-temporaries-60-day-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Denies Reconsideration; GCO Intends to Seek Supreme Court Review</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals of Georgia has denied a GCO member&#8217;s motion for reconsideration of its decision that probate judges, though required to issue GFLs within 60 days of application, may wait indefinitely to issue GFLs.  The documents may be viewed here:
http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Court of Appeals of Georgia has denied a GCO member&#8217;s motion for reconsideration of its decision that probate judges, though required to issue GFLs within 60 days of application, may wait indefinitely to issue GFLs.  The documents may be viewed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore" target="_blank">http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore</a>
</p>
<p><!--8e438cfdb1a84554acaa8c5bbe777b9a--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/06/07/appeals-court-denies-reconsideration-gco-intends-to-seek-supreme-court-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GCO Requests Reconsideration of 60-day Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/05/31/gco-requests-reconsideration-of-60-day-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/05/31/gco-requests-reconsideration-of-60-day-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/05/31/gco-requests-reconsideration-of-60-day-issue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GCO has filed a motion for reconsideration with the Court of Appeals of Georgia, asking the court to re-examine its recent decision holding that probate courts need not comply with the statute requiring issuance of GFLs within 60 days of application.  A copy of the brief is available here:
http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore/Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Reconsideration.pdf


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GCO has filed a motion for reconsideration with the Court of Appeals of Georgia, asking the court to re-examine its recent decision holding that probate courts need not comply with the statute requiring issuance of GFLs within 60 days of application.  A copy of the brief is available here:<br />
<a href="http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore/Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Reconsideration.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.georgiacarry.com/moore/Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Reconsideration.pdf</a><!--cbab6f2992f602ab2cc66a1633873ef5-->
</p>
<p><!--cba1b983116329df9cbfa54d1c0fa3d6--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/2007/05/31/gco-requests-reconsideration-of-60-day-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
